비뇨의학 Urology Digest ISSN:2713-7910(Print) 2733-5453(Online)

Chaussy CG et al., How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?, Urolithiasis, 2018

Kroczak T et al., Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes, World J Urol, 2017

Ouzaid I et al., A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study, BJU Int, 2012

Patel T et al., Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy, J Endourol, 2009

Tiselius HG et al., Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective, Urol Res, 2012

Ordon M et al., Does the radiologic technologist or the fluoroscopy time affect treatment success with shockwave lithotripsy?, J Endourol, 2012

Lingeman JE et al., Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique, Nat Rev Urol, 2009

Li K et al., Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, J Urol, 2013

Schuler TD et al., Medical expulsive therapy as an adjunct to improve shockwave lithotripsy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Endourol, 2009

EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Barcelona, 2019. ISBN 978-94-92671-04-2 (Available at: https://uroweb. org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/).

Pace KT et al., Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial, J Urol, 2001